Cassation practice before the Areios Pagos is a fundamentally different discipline from litigating at first instance, and even from an ordinary appeal before the Efeteio. A trial court hears witnesses and weighs evidence. The Efeteio, on an ordinary appeal, can revisit the facts as well as the law. The Areios Pagos does neither — it does not re-examine what happened, does not reassess the evidence, and does not retry the case. Its role is narrower and more exacting: to review whether the law was correctly applied and whether the lower court's legal reasoning was sound. A cassation appeal succeeds or fails on how precisely its grounds are framed, not on how sympathetic the underlying facts are. On cassation an appeal and cassation lawyer in Greece argues errors of law only, which is a different exercise from re-running the trial.
Cassation before the Areios Pagos requires rights of audience at that level, which is a separate senior admission rather than an automatic entitlement. The firm holds it, so an appeal can be carried through to the Supreme Court of Greece by the same lawyer who argued it below.
That distinction is why a former judge's perspective matters so directly in this practice. Founding partner Stefanos Pantazis is a registered lawyer at the Athens Bar Association and a former member of the Hellenic judiciary, where he handled a broad range of civil and commercial cases at first instance before returning to private practice and founding the firm in 2002. That judicial background gives him direct insight into how appellate judges actually read a case file — not just what the law provides on its face, but how a court reasons its way from the provisions to a conclusion, and which formulations of a legal argument land and which do not. Appeal deadlines are short — send the judgment as soon as you have it.
"At the Areios Pagos you do not retry the case. You identify where the judgment broke the law, or where its legal reasoning does not hold. That is where experience from the bench is worth most: it lets you read the judgment not only as a lawyer, but from the position of the judge who has to review it."
The Greek court system is layered for a reason, and not every dispute belongs at every level. A matter typically begins at first instance, may proceed to the Efeteio on an ordinary appeal where the facts can still be revisited, and — where the case turns on a genuine question of law or a defect in legal reasoning — may go forward to the Areios Pagos on cassation. We advise clients honestly on which stage actually serves their objectives, drawing on Stefanos's experience across all levels of the Greek court system, from first instance through cassation, rather than pursuing an appeal simply because one is technically available.
Scope of Review
Cassation reviews the application of the law, not the facts
The Areios Pagos does not reassess evidence or retry a case — it reviews whether the law was correctly applied and the legal reasoning was sound.
Precision
Grounds for cassation must be framed precisely
A cassation appeal succeeds on the precision and legal foundation of its grounds, not on how compelling the underlying facts are.
Judicial Insight
A former judge understands judicial reasoning from the inside
Stefanos Pantazis's time on the bench adds a different perspective to the cassation practice: he knows at first hand how a judgment is examined on appeal.
Strategy
Cassation is not an automatic next step
Before an appeal or cassation is brought, we assess whether there is a real ground for it — and whether the cost of the proceedings is justified.